Here is a simple illustration
that has come in handy when I explain natural selection. I like to call it my Natural Selection
Medicine Wheel, but in this diagram it looks more like a medicine rectangle.
I expect that the diagram will
be self-explanatory to anyone who understands natural selection. Consider a population of elk living, let us
say, in Wind Cave National Park. A heard
of such elk blundering in the campsite my son and I set up last year. The population
phenotype indicates the observable animals, including their physical traits
and behaviors. From a few cases of
observation, that means a bull and a lot of cows and maybe a few young male
offspring.
When the rut comes, all the
healthy adults will seek to mate. Pretty
much all the cows will be successful.
The bulls will have to fight, and the biggest bull with the biggest
antlers and attitude will succeed. Most
of the males will not be successful.
That challenge will determine
the makeup of the population genotype that will be carried by the cows and that
will determine the next generation. If
indeed the largest, best armed males get almost all the cows, the next
generation of sons will be similarly well-endowed.
One of the most persistent
questions in the philosophy of biology is what a species is. Zoological classification looks for a number
of identifying characteristics. However
useful that is, to say that a species is an essential bundle of characteristics
is called essentialism and that is largely discredited.
Another approach looks to
phylogeny. A species is one of the main branches
on the tree of life. The trunk forks here
to produce deer and elk; there, to produce humans and chimpanzees. That’s not bad, but it is rather
arbitrary. Which forks indicate a
species and which a sub species?
The best answer in the
scholarship is that a species is a population of interbreeding organisms. Of course, it raises the question whether two
populations of organisms that could interbreed but presently do not are the
same species or not?
I am inclined to approach the
problem in the spirit of classical philosophy.
Aristotle was torn between two answers to the basic question. One is that the species is this here group of
animals, pawing the turf and breathing mist into the air. The second is that the species is the species
form, for that is what persists over time.
I happen to think that Plato is the better guide on this question.
I think that the species is
indeed a form rather than a particular collection of meat and hoofs. The form is precisely the wheel that I
illustrate above. The species is the
dynamic by which some population phenotype produces a population genotype which…
. It may be said that this account works
only for sexually reproducing organisms.
I reply that that is because only such creatures sort themselves into a
species. Common sense can tell us the difference
between a wolf and a bear. The dynamic
of natural selection as I illustrate it above is the ultimate reality
underlying that difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment