tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-223797477664258632.post7124028137399745495..comments2023-09-11T01:18:18.763-07:00Comments on Natural Right and Biology: Virtue Ethics & Circular ReasoningKen Blanchardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09580209017016829598noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-223797477664258632.post-32980361342523137902015-02-14T19:04:39.245-08:002015-02-14T19:04:39.245-08:00The piano analogy is absolutely circular. It leave...The piano analogy is absolutely circular. It leaves out what actually distinguishes great playing from bad: the experience created. Granted, listening plays a part in that, and can be developed as a skill, but the point is that neither playing nor listening would be considered "great" if they couldn't play a role in creating some sort of high-quality experience. The fact that humans are uniquely capable of creating such experiences doesn't mean that capability is what *defines* the greatness of the act. That part lies in the quality of the experience itself, a.k.a. the consequence.lorthohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05422652902795342119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-223797477664258632.post-41049469394562986262014-09-19T20:48:36.883-07:002014-09-19T20:48:36.883-07:00I'm sorry, anonymous, but you are going to hav...I'm sorry, anonymous, but you are going to have to give me more than this to go on.Ken Blanchardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09580209017016829598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-223797477664258632.post-84011888040556200372014-09-09T07:13:26.349-07:002014-09-09T07:13:26.349-07:00I'm sorry but that reasoning is indeed circula...I'm sorry but that reasoning is indeed circular. Please look the definition up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com